Jump to content
Sadikhov IT Certification forums
Sign in to follow this  
lamo

Gigabit ethernet optical/electrical config difference

Recommended Posts

Hi experts, I would like to appologize for so lame question posted here, but still...

 

Could you advise if it is possible to differentiate GigabitEthernet port optical from electrical on 7609 Cisco router. I mean If I have only startup-config, what is the difference in configuration (if any) between optical and electrical GigabitEthernet ports.

 

Thank you in avance and once again sorry

 

Lame

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You mean if you are using say an Optical interface versus a physical Ethernet Interface...?

 

Hmm...

 

The difference between the OSM - optical interfaces and the copper Ethernet interfaces have to do with:

 

1. The physical layer

 

2. Some of the features that one might have versus the other.

 

Now with that said...

 

This is the config on the OSM:

 

interface GE-WAN9/1

bandwidth 50000

ip address x.x.x.9 255.255.255.252

ip pim sparse-mode

no negotiation auto

mls qos trust dscp

service-policy output AJA

 

This is another OSM interface with a subinterface configured:

 

interface GE-WAN9/4.111

description Metro E

bandwidth 50000

encapsulation dot1Q 111

ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.0

ip pim sparse-mode

mls qos trust dscp

service-policy output AKA

 

This is a copper Ethernet interface:

 

interface GigabitEthernet1/1

description ** Link to 3845 G0/1 **

ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.252

ip pim sparse-mode

speed 1000

duplex full

mls qos trust dscp

end

 

 

 

All of these are on a Catatlyst 6500 Series Switch.

 

Not much difference config-wise.

 

Darby

 

http://www.darbyslogs.blogspot.com

Edited by Darby Weaver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for your reply ...

just to confirm... if I see lets say GigabitEthernet 1/1 then I am safe to say that this is electrical (just a copper wire). And the difference between is only naming conventions. Is it correct ?

Or GigabitEthernet 1/1 also can be optical ???

 

Best regards

 

Lame

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I mean to say that in case of not WAN interfaces but simple board with 1 G SFP tranceivers we also will get naming convention like GigabitEthernet 1/1 and not GE-WAN9/x. Please crrect me if I am wrong. Probably I just cannot explain myself well. So just summary of the question is that:

 

Can GigabitEthernet 1/1 be an optical interface or it is definitely copper ?

 

Thank you in avance for prompt response and

 

Best regards

 

Lame

Edited by lamo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In my case:

 

1. GE-WAN9/x is an optical interface. It is optical.

 

2. GigabitEthernet1/1 is copper as is WS-X6748-GE-TX it could easily be a WS-6516 with Fiber 5458 GBICs or even the WS-X6724 with Gigabit SFPs...

 

The config is essentially the same.

 

There is a difference!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

In the OSM Blade (Only 4 ports in my case per chassis) it also supports QoS functions as a router not as a switch. That is a HUGE difference. Have you ever used a Flex-WAN module in a 6500 chassis before - basically a module that takes PA-XXX modules from a 7200/7500 series router.

 

The OSM (optical) ports work, taste, and feel like a router - the best place to demonstrate this is with QoS.

 

 

Hope that helps.

 

Otherwise most of the config is not really that different at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

×